Ilable on the internet at https://www.mdpi.com/article/ 10.3390/ijerph182111028/s1, Supplementary
Ilable on the internet at https://www.mdpi.com/article/ ten.3390/ijerph182111028/s1, Supplementary File S1: Search tactic; Supplementary File S2: High quality assessment of included studies; Supplementary File S3: List of excluded JPH203 Cancer research from full-text assessment. Supplementary file S4: Summary of findings (expanded). Author Contributions: Aztreonam In stock Conceptualization, T.A.-B. and X.F.; methodology: P.-Y.N.; validation: T.A.-B. and X.F.; formal analysis, P.-Y.N. and H.R.-A.; data curation, P.-Y.N.; writing–original draft preparation, P.-Y.N.; writing–review and editing, P.-Y.N., X.F., and T.A.-B.; supervision, X.F.; funding acquisition, X.F. and T.A.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version on the manuscript. Funding: This study was supported by a National Wellness and Healthcare Research Council Boosting Dementia Research Leader Fellowship 1140317 (Astell-Burt) and the National Overall health and Medical Investigation Council Profession Improvement Fellowship 1148792 (Feng). Astell-Burt and Feng had been also jointly supported by grant 1101065 in the National Wellness and Health-related Investigation Council project and grant GC15005 from the Green Cities Fund–Hort Innovation Restricted, with co-investment from the University of Wollongong Faculty of Social Sciences, the University of Wollongong Worldwide Challenges initiative, as well as the Australian Government. The funding sources had no role in the design and style and conduct from the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of your data;Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Well being 2021, 18,34 ofpreparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; plus the choice to submit the manuscript for publication. Institutional Review Board Statement: Ethical assessment and approval have been waived for this study, as the overview does not use private information. Informed Consent Statement: Patient consent was waived for this study, as the review does not use private data. Data Availability Statement: The information presented in this study are offered within the major short article and Supplementary Files. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
International Journal ofEnvironmental Investigation and Public HealthArticleA Comparative Analysis on the Perception of Cancer Individuals and Healthcare Providers (Oncology Physicians, Nurses, Social Workers) in Help of Integrated Community-Linked Cancer PlansYoung Ae Kim 1 , Min Gee Choi 1 , E Hwa Yun two , So-Youn Jung three , Ah Kyung Park 4 , Hye Ri Choi 1 and Yoon Jung Chang 1, National Cancer Center, National Cancer Handle Institute, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; [email protected] (Y.A.K.); [email protected] (M.G.C.); [email protected] (H.R.C.) National Cancer Center, Division of Cancer Registration Surveillance, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; [email protected] Cancer Healthcare Research Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; [email protected] Social Function Group, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si 10408, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; [email protected] Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 82-31-920-Citation: Kim, Y.A.; Choi, M.G.; Yun, E.H.; Jung, S.-Y.; Park, A.K.; Choi, H.R.; Chang, Y.J. A Comparative Evaluation on the Perception of Cancer Patients and Healthcare Providers (Oncology Physicians, Nurses, Social Workers) in Support of Integrated Community-Linked Cancer Plans. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Well being 2021, 18, 11517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph182111517 Academic Editor: William Douglas Evans Received: 3 August 2021 Accepted: 19 October 2021 Published: 2 Nove.