CesEffect of folic acid on hot flashesTable 1. Comparison in the demographic qualities with the two study groups Variables Age (year) Gravidity Parity Duration of menopause (months) Systolic blood pressure Diastolic blood stress BMI Menopause Natural Induced Primary Education level Secondary Collage University Occupation Housewife Employee Retired Sufficient earnings Yes No Somewhat Sports Never Occasionally Frequently Constantly Marital status Single Married Divorced WidowFolic acid Imply (SD) 52.94 (three.37) 4.88 (two.33) four.11 (1.92) 38.31 (27.01) 110.57 (ten.83) 69.71 (9.28) 27.40 (four.74) N ( ) 27 (77) 8 (23) 20 (57) 1 (3) three (eight) 11 (32) 23 (65) ten (29) 2 (6) 18 (50) three (9) 14 (41) 19 (53) ten (29) 4 (12) two (six) 1 (3) 29 (83) 0 five (14)Placebo Mean (SD) 53.05 (three.40) four.82 (two.09) four.05 (1.74) 38.48 (25.53) 106.28 (10.59) 66 (10.05) 26.54 (4.22) N ( ) 29 (83) six (17) 22 (62) 2 (6) 1 (three) ten (29) 25 (72) 7 (20) three (8) 16 (44) 7 (21) 12 (35) 17 (47) 9 (26) five (15) 4 (12) 2 (six) 27 (77) 0 6 (17)Neurotensin Receptor site Statistical index t=-0.14, P=0.88,df= 68 t=0.108, P=0.91, df=68 t=0.130, P=0.89, df=68 t=0.184, P=0.85, df=68 t=1.67, P=0.09, df=68 t=1.61, P=0.11, df=68 t=0.805, P=0.42, df=68 2=0.357 P=0.55, df=1 Z=-0.459 P=0.2=0.813 P=0.66, df=2 Z=-0.052 P=0.Z=-0.717 P=0.2=0.496 P=0.78, df=For the regarded variables U-Mann Whitney test was usedseverity ahead of and right after therapy there was a PPARĪ³ list important distinction (p 0.05). There was no substantial distinction between means of hot flash severity with the two groups inside the first week soon after treatment; but, this distinction was significant within the second, third, and fourth weeks just after therapy (Table two). There was no considerable distinction among the two groups ahead of remedy with regards to the frequency of hot flashes (p = 0.47). There was a significant distinction between the mean hot flash frequency with the groups ahead of and just after treatment (p 0.05). The imply hot flash frequency in the two groups had no significant difference in theCopyright 2013 by Tabriz University of Health-related Sciencesfirst and second weeks immediately after treatment. Nonetheless, there was a significant distinction inside the third and fourth weeks immediately after therapy (Table three). The results also indicated that there was no considerable distinction between the two groups relating to the duration of hot flash just before the remedy (p = 0.46). Within-group comparison showed a considerable distinction relating to mean hot flash duration just before and following the treatment (p 0.05). There was no important distinction involving the groups for the duration of the very first, second, and third weeks just after treatment depending on the imply hot flash duration. Nonetheless, within the fourth week afterJournal of Caring Sciences, Jun 2013; 2 (2), 131-140|Bani et al.therapy there was a important differencebetween the two groups (Table 4).Table two. Mean hot flush severity depending on the comply with up by time divisions inside the remedy groups Folic acid Imply (SD) two.23 (0.677) two.16 (0.789) 1.86 (0.584) 1.62 (0.621) 1.42 (0.654) F = 26.13 df = 2.28 P 0.001 Placebo Mean (SD) 2.15 (0.673) 2.14 (0.619) 1.96 (0.624) 1.95 (0.586) 1.99 (0.609) F = 8.83 df = 1.93 P 0.001 Statistical indicators(between-group) P = 0.59, df = 68, t = 0.531 P = 0.60, df = 1, F = 0.270 P = 0.03, df = 1, F = 4.44 P = 0.00, df = 1, F = 16.09 P = 0.00, df = 1, F = 30.Ahead of remedy Initial week Second week Third week Fourth week ANOVA with repeatedmeasure(within-group)ANCOVATable 3. Mean hot flash frequency determined by the stick to up by time divisions in the therapy groups Folic acid Placebo Stat.