Along with the hangers on the south side ofside with the model bridge have been

Along with the hangers on the south side ofside with the model bridge have been preset because the broken Betamethasone disodium Biological Activity hanger separately. The degree south the model bridge were preset as the broken hanger separately. The degree of harm was set set12.five , 25 , 37.5 andand 50 , respectively. EDC17 DC24 belongs to of harm was to to 12.five , 25 , 37.five 50 , respectively. EDC17 DC24 belongs towards the second category, in which harm occurred in two hangers simultaneously. The The dethe second category, in which harm occurred in two hangers simultaneously. degree of Nitrocefin Biological Activity Damage was also set toset to 12.five , 25 , 37.five , 50 ,50 , respectively. Table 5 all of the gree of damage was also 12.five , 25 , 37.5 , and and respectively. Table 5 lists lists all damage situations investigated within the test model. the damage circumstances investigated within the test model.Table 5. Twenty-four damage situations deemed by the test model. Table five. Twenty-four harm circumstances deemed by the test model.Harm Case No. Harm Case No. EDC 1 EDC 1 EDC 5 Single hanger failure Single hanger EDC five EDC 92 EDC 136 failure EDC 92 EDC 170 Double hanger failure EDC 136 EDC 214 Double hanger EDC 170 failure EDC 214 four.three. Harm Identification Outcomes Damage Sort Harm Kind Damage Hanger No. Damage Hanger No. S2 S2 S3 S3 S4 S5 S4 S4 S5 S5 S4 S6 S4 S5 S4 S6 Damage Degree Damage Degree 12.5 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.five 50Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW12 of 17 The model cable force was adjusted to about 350 N, and also the south hanger cable force 4.three. Harm Identification Benefits is shown in Figure 11. The cable force is uniform, and this state is often regarded because the The model cable bridge. completed state of your force was adjusted to about 350 N, as well as the south hanger cable force is shown in Figure 11. The cable force is uniform, and this state could be regarded because the completed state of the bridge.cable force350Cable force250 200 150 100 50SSSSSSSSSHanger numberFigure Cable force of of south hangers. Figure 11.11. Cable force south hangers.The total harm (the cable force is lowered by one hundred ) each and every hanger on on south The complete damage (the cable force is reduced by one hundred ) ofof each and every hanger the the sideside was simulatedremoving the broken hanger itself. The The difference of dewas simulated by by removing the broken hanger itself. distinction of deflection south in the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam under healthful state state and several flection in the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam under healthyand many damage conditions was was obtained, along with the outcomes are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the dedamage conditionsobtained, along with the final results are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the deflection distinction influence matrix of the model bridge within this state state was also obtained. flection distinction influence matrix with the model bridge in thiswas also obtained.0 lection change anchorage point -1 -2 -S1 S2 S3 SAppl. Sci. 2021, 11,The comprehensive damage (the cable force is lowered by 100 ) of each hanger on the south side was simulated by removing the damaged hanger itself. The distinction of deflection in the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam under healthy state and numerous harm circumstances was obtained, and the results are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the de12 of 16 flection distinction influence.