S. BP and HR assessment was carried out prior to walk testing and handgrip testing by trained study personnel.Statistical Analyses Methods Ethics StatementAll participants provided written informed consent, and the institutional review boards of all participating institutions (Cooper Institute, Stanford University, University of Pittsburgh, and Wake Forest University) approved this study protocol. All aspects of this study were conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and is Pleuromutilin registered at http://www. ClinicalTrials.gov (registration # NCT00116194). All data are reported as means 
6 standard error of the mean (SEM). A priori significance was set at p,0.05 for a two sided test. Normality of distribution was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Participants were categorized into tertiles according to pulse pressure. Gait speed, along with other continuous variables, was compared across tertiles using ANOVA (Tukey post hoc comparisons). If group differences existed in potential confounders, these variables were entered into the model as covariates 1081537 (ANCOVA). Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables across tertiles. Univariate associations were examined with Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Stepwise multiple regression was used to examine predictors of absolute 400-m gait speed. Variables entered into the model included: age, gender, grip strength, body weight, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, heart rate, medication history (use of statins, aspirin, hormone replacement therapy, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/ angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics), history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, myocardialParticipantsThe study participants consisted of 424 community-dwelling older adults between 70?9 years of age enrolled in the Lifestyle Intervention and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P) Study, a randomized controlled pilot clinical trial evaluating the effect of physical activity on mobility disability. Participants were included if they had functional limitations [defined as scoring #9 on the short physical performance battery [20]], were able to completeAging, Pulse Pressure and Gait Speedinfarction (stable coronary disease), smoking and clinic examination site. We then used the enter method to specifically compare the association of the individual BP components with gait speed. Those variables that previously demonstrated univariate associations with gait speed were first entered and they included: age, handgrip strength, body mass and presence of diabetes mellitus (p,0.1). Sex and heart rate were forced into the model. Separate models were then created by entering each BP variable (SBP, DBP, MAP, and PP) into a second block using a hierarchical design. A final model was created that adjusted for PP after inclusion of MAP with aforementioned co-variables. The R2 change and F change were HIV-RT inhibitor 1 computed to evaluate each model fit. Finally, participants with 400-meter gait speed ,1.0 m/s were identified and defined as having slow gait speed according to a previously established clinical cut point [23]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to examine the sensitivity of PP and MAP to predict slow gait (as a dichotomous variable) in older adults. All data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 16.0 GP (SPSS, Inc.,.S. BP and HR assessment was carried out prior to walk testing and handgrip testing by trained study personnel.Statistical Analyses Methods Ethics StatementAll participants provided written informed consent, and the institutional review boards of all participating institutions (Cooper Institute, Stanford University, University of Pittsburgh, and Wake Forest University) approved this study protocol. All aspects of this study were conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and is registered at http://www. ClinicalTrials.gov (registration # NCT00116194). All data are reported as means 6 standard error of the mean (SEM). A priori significance was set at p,0.05 for a two sided test. Normality of distribution was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Participants were categorized into tertiles according to pulse pressure. Gait speed, along with other continuous variables, was compared across tertiles using ANOVA (Tukey post hoc comparisons). If group differences existed in potential confounders, these variables were entered into the model as covariates 1081537 (ANCOVA). Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables across tertiles. Univariate associations were examined with Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Stepwise multiple regression was used to examine predictors of absolute 400-m gait speed. Variables entered into the model included: 
age, gender, grip strength, body weight, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, heart rate, medication history (use of statins, aspirin, hormone replacement therapy, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/ angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics), history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, myocardialParticipantsThe study participants consisted of 424 community-dwelling older adults between 70?9 years of age enrolled in the Lifestyle Intervention and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P) Study, a randomized controlled pilot clinical trial evaluating the effect of physical activity on mobility disability. Participants were included if they had functional limitations [defined as scoring #9 on the short physical performance battery [20]], were able to completeAging, Pulse Pressure and Gait Speedinfarction (stable coronary disease), smoking and clinic examination site. We then used the enter method to specifically compare the association of the individual BP components with gait speed. Those variables that previously demonstrated univariate associations with gait speed were first entered and they included: age, handgrip strength, body mass and presence of diabetes mellitus (p,0.1). Sex and heart rate were forced into the model. Separate models were then created by entering each BP variable (SBP, DBP, MAP, and PP) into a second block using a hierarchical design. A final model was created that adjusted for PP after inclusion of MAP with aforementioned co-variables. The R2 change and F change were computed to evaluate each model fit. Finally, participants with 400-meter gait speed ,1.0 m/s were identified and defined as having slow gait speed according to a previously established clinical cut point [23]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to examine the sensitivity of PP and MAP to predict slow gait (as a dichotomous variable) in older adults. All data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 16.0 GP (SPSS, Inc.,.