Al outcomes: (1) microbological Torin 1 mechanism of action eradication, (2) presumed Olmutinib site microbiological eradication, (3) presumed microbiological improvement, (4) microbiological persistence, (5) presumed microbiological persistence, (6) unable to determine, (7) new pathogen, and (8) colonization. Patients who were designated microbiological eradication, presumed microbiological eradication, presumed microbiological improvement, or colonization as defined in numbers 1, 2, 3, and 8 above were considered a “microbiological success” while all others were considered “microbiological failure.” Therapeutic response was determined from the clinical response and the microbiological response. Patients who qualified as both a “clinical success” and a “microbiological success” were deemed a “therapeutic success,” and all others were deemed “therapeutic failures.” Wound size area was determined by measuring the greatest length of the wound in two perpendicular dimensions with a standard metric ruler. The two measurements were multiplied together to provide an estimate of the overall wound size. Surrounding erythema was not included in the measurement. Signs and symptoms of the lesions were assessed based on the following factors: erythema, purulence, crusting, edema, warmth, and pain. Each factor was classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe. Samples size and statistical methods The study was a prospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, open label, and single center trial to evaluate the efficacy of retapamulin ointment 1 at treating impetigo, folliculitis, and other minor soft tissue infections in children and adults. A total of 50 patients were recruited between April 2008 and November 2012. Seven of the 38 patients in the CLI safety population were culture positive at baseline for MRSA and qualified for the primary efficacy (RES) population. Descriptive statistics were summarized for all demographic characteristics, baseline variables, and three responses (clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic). Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to see how clinical response was related to several prognostic factors, including wound sizes at different visits, sex, age, and the presence of MRSA. Odds ratio (OR) with 95 confidence interval was reported for each factor. The comparison of wound size change at followup visit to baseline was conducted by paired t test. A p value of b .05 was considered statistically significant for the main effect. S-plus/R software was used for all statistical analyses. Results Study population A total of 50 patients were recruited between April 2008 and November 2012. The disposition of patients in the study is presented in Fig. 1. The 38 patients who received retapamulin ointment 1 made up the CLI safety population, and 35 of these patients were culture positive, making up the MIC population. Of the 37 patients who completed the study, only 7 were MRSA positive and qualified for the primary efficacy population (RES). Twelve patients were culture negative and, therefore, did not qualify for any efficacy analysis. Only one patient (2.6 ) withdrew from the study before completing all study proceduresTable 5 Skin infection rating scale. Retapamulin ointment 1 , n = 35 (MIC population) Item Category 1 Erythema Score Scale 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 Absent Minimal Moderate Severe Absent Minimal Moderate Severe Absent Minimal Moderate Severe Absent Minimal Moderate Severe Absent Minimal Mod.Al outcomes: (1) microbological eradication, (2) presumed microbiological eradication, (3) presumed microbiological improvement, (4) microbiological persistence, (5) presumed microbiological persistence, (6) unable to determine, (7) new pathogen, and (8) colonization. Patients who were designated microbiological eradication, presumed microbiological eradication, presumed microbiological improvement, or colonization as defined in numbers 1, 2, 3, and 8 above were considered a “microbiological success” while all others were considered “microbiological failure.” Therapeutic response was determined from the clinical response and the microbiological response. Patients who qualified as both a “clinical success” and a “microbiological success” were deemed a “therapeutic success,” and all others were deemed “therapeutic failures.” Wound size area was determined by measuring the greatest length of the wound in two perpendicular dimensions with a standard metric ruler. The two measurements were multiplied together to provide an estimate of the overall wound size. Surrounding erythema was not included in the measurement. Signs and symptoms of the lesions were assessed based on the following factors: erythema, purulence, crusting, edema, warmth, and pain. Each factor was classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe. Samples size and statistical methods The study was a prospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, open label, and single center trial to evaluate the efficacy of retapamulin ointment 1 at treating impetigo, folliculitis, and other minor soft tissue infections in children and adults. A total of 50 patients were recruited between April 2008 and November 2012. Seven of the 38 patients in the CLI safety population were culture positive at baseline for MRSA and qualified for the primary efficacy (RES) population. Descriptive statistics were summarized for all demographic characteristics, baseline variables, and three responses (clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic). Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to see how clinical response was related to several prognostic factors, including wound sizes at different visits, sex, age, and the presence of MRSA. Odds ratio (OR) with 95 confidence interval was reported for each factor. The comparison of wound size change at followup visit to baseline was conducted by paired t test. A p value of b .05 was considered statistically significant for the main effect. S-plus/R software was used for all statistical analyses. Results Study population A total of 50 patients were recruited between April 2008 and November 2012. The disposition of patients in the study is presented in Fig. 1. The 38 patients who received retapamulin ointment 1 made up the CLI safety population, and 35 of these patients were culture positive, making up the MIC population. Of the 37 patients who completed the study, only 7 were MRSA positive and qualified for the primary efficacy population (RES). Twelve patients were culture negative and, therefore, did not qualify for any efficacy analysis. Only one patient (2.6 ) withdrew from the study before completing all study proceduresTable 5 Skin infection rating scale. Retapamulin ointment 1 , n = 35 (MIC population) Item Category 1 Erythema Score Scale 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 Absent Minimal Moderate Severe Absent Minimal Moderate Severe Absent Minimal Moderate Severe Absent Minimal Moderate Severe Absent Minimal Mod.